JHK URBAN RESEARCH LAB™

본 섹션은 JHK Urban Research Lab이 진행하는 디자인 관련 연구분야를 소개합니다. 이외에 필요한 분야의 제안도 받고 있습니다.

In 1845, Karl Marx wrote, "The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however, is to change it."
We are "Creative Brokers" in compelling, assimilating and recombining knowledge economies in new ways.

Believing a notion that every object has its unique identity, a set of information, which can be formulated and utilised.
Information exchange happens between organism; human and environment; object. The experiencer extracts information from the object and uses that information to generate, formulate on their unique character.
We synthesizes ideas from disparate fields and transmits them in novel ways.

JHK 리서치랩에서는 아래와 같은 디자인 관련 연구를 진행합니다.

A. European Exhibition coordination and curatorial assist. 유럽 전시 코디네이션 과 전시 준비

유럽에서 진행되는 디자인 관련 행사에 참여하려는 회사와 기관의 현지 코디네이션에서 전시와 관련된 기획, 준비, 현지 조사, 보고서 작성까지 협력 진행합니다.

Planning, implementation & final report on design related exhibitions in Europe.

Our research lab will maintain clients checklists, digital images, and exhibition and object credit lines; design and produce labels, design and coordinate production of exhibition graphics; respond to inquiries regarding object information and reproduction rights; and manage digital image archive of collections and exhibitions.

We will generate records and files related to exhibitions including signage, texts, and installation floor plans. We will also produce information related to the competitors' business plan. We will research materials related to exhibition design, assist with exhibition design, and help with the changes on client's collection. We will work with the curators and work in a team environment with registrar, education, conservation, communications, development, and operational staff.

…

B. Research related Data ownership & Privacy . 프라이버시와 정보 소유권에 대한 리서치

정보의 홍수 속에서 다양한 정보를 이용한 커뮤니케이션의 방식 또한 다양하게 시도되고 있습니다. 개념적 과거의 생년월일은 가족과 친척들 사이에서만 공유되어지는 개인정보였던 반면에 현재의 생년월일은 생활에 필요한 기본적인 서비스 (교통, 통신 등)의 사용에 필요한 기본정보 (공공정보)로의 변화가 서비스 제공자에 의해 강제되고 있는 것이 현실입니다. 이러한 개인의 의지와 상관없이 확장되고 있는 정보교환의 개념속에서 개인정보와 공공정보의 경계는 어떻게 정의할 수 있을까요? 과연 우리는 우리가 가진 정보의 가장 효율적인 공유의 범위를 정할 수 있을까요?

JHK Urban Research Lab 에서는 정보공유와 커뮤니케이션과의 관계에 대한 리서치를 하고 있습니다. 진행된 리서치는 Research Projects 에서 확인하실 수 있습니다.

People have its own unique filter that articulates information and distils data set to what is meaningful to them. The filter is sponsored by their unique cultural background which has been built with a form of schema that somebody outside do not understand the automated colourful exposition.

Data ownership refers to both the possession of and responsibility for information. Ownership implies power as well as control. The control of information includes not just the ability to access, create, modify, package, derive benefit from, sell or remove data, but also the right to assign these access privileges to others (Loshin, 2002).

Implicit in having control over access to data is the ability to share data with colleagues that promote advancement in a field of investigation (the notable exception to the unqualified sharing of data would be research involving human subjects). Scofield (1998) suggest replacing the term 'ownership' with 'stewardship', "because it implies a broader responsibility where the user must consider the consequences of making changes over 'his' data".

According to Garner (1999), individuals having intellectual property have rights to control intangible objects that are products of human intellect. The range of these products encompasses the fields of art, industry, and science. Research data is recognized as a form of intellectual property and subject to protection by U.S. law.

Importance of data ownership:

According to Loshin (2002), data has intrinsic value as well as having added value as a byproduct of information processing, "at the core, the degree of ownership (and by corollary, the degree of responsibility) is driven by the value that each interested party derives from the use of that information".

The general consensus of science emphasizes the principle of openness (Panel Sci. Responsib. Conduct Res. 1992). Thus, sharing data has a number of benefits to society in general and protecting the integrity of scientific data in particular. The Committee on National Statistics' 1985 report on sharing data (Fienberg, Martin, Straf, 1985) noted that sharing data reinforces open scientific inquiry, encourages a diversity of analyses and conclusions, and permits.

…